Committed Marxists do not believe in authentic dialogue , only tactical and ideological subversion. Liberation theology arose in the s and 70s as a response to the widespread poverty and injustice in Latin America. It began with the Gospel premise that Christians have a special obligation to help the poor. But like so many theological movements which depart from sound Catholic principles, it began importing alien ideologies, and quickly went astray.
The errors of liberation theology have been well-documented and censured by the Magisterium. But since there have been renewed efforts to whitewash its past, those missteps bear repeating. T he first offense of liberation theology was one of presumption. The second error of liberation theology has been its repeated calumnies. Although liberation theologians often complained—and still complain—of being unfairly treated, they have been in the forefront of launching reckless, ad hominen attacks against their critics.
Roger Vekemans, an outstanding Belgian Jesuit who spent decades supporting the poor in Latin America, was demonized by left-wing clergy because he refused to incorporate Marxism into his social justice teachings, and remained faithful to the Church. Similarly, when the Vatican issued two corrective documents on liberation theology at the instruction of St.
And the list goes on. And there is too much value in the theology of liberation to throw it all out. We might find ourselves again discarding the baby with the bath. But—the evangelical must be selective as he pans for gold. He must insist on the normative and final authority of the Word of God. Because, in the last analysis, the two systems—liberationism and evangelicalism—are not really compatible.
It will inevitably distort or partialize the truth. Our first loyalty must always be to Jesus Christ and the gospel. Sociology, economics, and political science may well be handmaidens of the gospel, but the relationship cannot be reversed. He has lived there since Have something to add about this? See something we missed? Share your feedback here. Our digital archives are a work in progress.
Let us know if corrections need to be made. Already a subscriber? Log in to continue reading. To unlock this article for your friends, use any of the social share buttons on our site, or simply copy the link below.
To share this article with your friends, use any of the social share buttons on our site, or simply copy the link below. Sections Home. Bible Coronavirus Prayer. Subscribe Member Benefits Give a Gift.
Subscribers receive full access to the archives. Dayton Roberts October 19, Article continues below. Free Newsletters Get the best from CT editors, delivered straight to your inbox! Tags: None. Issue: October 19 , Vol. More From: W. Dayton Roberts. This article is from the October 19 issue. Log in. October 19 More from this Issue.
Law and Mercy. Religious programs, including evangelical schools, are a major force for good behind bars. Public Theology. However, the connections between Marxism and liberation theology are not as clear-cut as critics have tried to argue. Though liberation theology recognizes the power of man as a master of his own fate and proposes revolutionary praxis in a manner similar to Marxism, liberation theology lacks many fundamental aspects of Marxism.
The theology makes no claims against the incompatibility between religion and empiricism and maintains Christian doctrine, which Marx vehemently opposed. When more carefully compared to each other, the sole clear connection between Marxism and liberation theology is a focus on empowering the poor and class struggle Lynch 20, Despite the fairly scant theoretical connections between the two, words like revolution and socialism linked and continued to link liberation theology with the highly controversial and often feared doctrine of Marx, preventing more widespread acceptance and formal approval of the Vatican.
To some extent, the fears of the Vatican were indeed enacted by the liberation theology movement through the creation of Christian Base Communities CEBs and Theological Reflection workshops.
Christian Base Communities were small Christian groups led by lay figures in individual towns or small areas that embodied the teachings of liberation theology. They encouraged popular participation and worked to try to avoid pastoral problems by creating an emphasis on community work and support. CEBs taught peasants basic skills like reading and writing along with religious teachings in an effort to empower and liberate them Hillar.
From these groups, the poor were able to organize and create a sense of unity that allowed for social questioning. Later into the movement, the base communities not only acted as a means to disseminate liberation theology, but also as a means of inspiration for the liberation theology movement. CEBs allowed the poor to direct the movement and to emphasize the struggle of the oppressed Tombs These workshops, held throughout the summer, allowed for discussion of liberation theology and created a space for dialogue between activists, theologians and all those who had an interest in learning about the theology.
Initially started in with two hundred participants, the workshops grew over the s and 80s to reach 2. The workshops created a space for popular exchange and allowed for deeper explanation of the concepts of the movement.
The sense of power and autonomy that the CEBs and the Theological Reflection Workshops created within the lower classes was exactly what the Vatican had feared. The ability of the poor to work to redefine their own fate and their own relationship with the Church exemplified the kind of loss of traditional authority of which Ratzinger spoke.
However, rather than the feared deviation from the Christian faith, this empowerment of the poor and inclusion of a popular sentiment created a more tangible way for the oppressed to access and interact with their Christianity. Though the opposition greatly feared this empowerment, liberation theology ands its programs undeniably educated and enhanced the lives of lower classes by providing the outlets and tools to more actively address their own situations.
By the late s and early s, the movement had begun to lose its push as new economic and social concerns arose that liberation theology could not directly address.
By arguing that liberation theology could lead to disunity and excessive focus on material success, opposition was able to successfully undercut the more noble goals of this movement Lynch , 3.
Evidence that the movement was clearly in retreat could be seen by the frequent changes that it began to undergo, leaving little certainty as to its true direction. By arguing that this movement secularized the Christian faith and effectively rid Catholicism of its connection to the afterlife, John Paul II and other prominent religious leaders were able to quell the movement and alarm people enough to associate liberation theology with a loss of faith Lynch , By the s, the Catholic right proposed reconciliation theology in direct opposition to liberation theology.
Essentially, the Vatican and more traditional sects of Catholicism proposed a watered-down version of the theology that avoided the physical and social disruption that liberation entailed. Despite its ultimate fall in popularity, liberation theology changed the role of the Church in Peru and all of Latin America forever.
By giving a voice and sense of empowerment to the impoverished, liberation theology held the Church accountable for the welfare of the lower class, recognizing the essential role of social justice in Christian teachings. This movement rethought the power structures of Latin American society and showed that religion could promote highly politicized campaigns. Although the prospect of radical change alarmed the Vatican, the potential for an uprising finally incorporated the voices of the poor in religious discourse.
Followers of the movement demanded that the Church move beyond simple charity work towards a more active role in the promotion of social justice. Liberation theology brought the focus of the Church away from solely eternal salvation to the more pressing necessity of earthly liberation of the poor from oppression and suffering. Brown, Robert McAfee. Atlanta: John Knox, It fights against giving a solely fact oriented biographical account, looking into deeper themes and patterns. This website has online versions of some of the documents created during the Vatican II meetings.
These include transcripts of some of the conferences and general declarations formed as a result of the meetings. Maryknoll, N. This book is the magnum opus of liberation theology. This work was the transformative piece that essentially beganthe more formally published aspect of the movement. Rosino Gibellini.
0コメント