Nevertheless, when different methods for measuring the electronegativity of an atom are compared, they all tend to assign similar relative values to a given element. In this scale a value of 4. In general, electronegativity increases from left to right across a period in the periodic table and decreases down a group. Note that noble gases are excluded from this figure because these atoms usually do not share electrons with others atoms since they have a full valence shell.
Electronegativity is defined as the ability of an atom in a particular molecule to attract electrons to itself. The larger the electronegativity value, the greater the attraction. The two idealized extremes of chemical bonding: 1 ionic bonding —in which one or more electrons are transferred completely from one atom to another, and the resulting ions are held together by purely electrostatic forces—and 2 covalent bonding , in which electrons are shared equally between two atoms.
Most compounds, however, have polar covalent bonds , which means that electrons are shared unequally between the bonded atoms. Electronegativity determines how the shared electrons are distributed between the two atoms in a polar covalent bond. The more strongly an atom attracts the electrons in its bonds, the larger its electronegativity.
Electrons in a polar covalent bond are shifted toward the more electronegative atom; thus, the more electronegative atom is the one with the partial negative charge. The greater the difference in electronegativity, the more polarized the electron distribution and the larger the partial charges of the atoms. When the difference is very small or zero, the bond is covalent and nonpolar. When it is large, the bond is polar covalent or ionic. The absolute values of the electronegativity differences between the atoms in the bonds H—H, H—Cl, and Na—Cl are 0 nonpolar , 0.
The degree to which electrons are shared between atoms varies from completely equal pure covalent bonding to not at all ionic bonding. Figure 7. This table is just a general guide, however, with many exceptions. The best guide to the covalent or ionic character of a bond is to consider the types of atoms involved and their relative positions in the periodic table.
Bonds between two nonmetals are generally covalent; bonding between a metal and a nonmetal is often ionic. Some compounds contain both covalent and ionic bonds. However, these polyatomic ions form ionic compounds by combining with ions of opposite charge.
Bond polarities play an important role in determining the structure of proteins. The trends are not very smooth among the transition metals and the inner transition metals, but are fairly regular for the main group elements, and can be seen in the charts below.
The difference in electronegativity between two bonded elements determines what type of bond they will form. When atoms with an electronegativity difference of greater than two units are joined together, the bond that is formed is an ionic bond , in which the more electronegative element has a negative charge, and the less electronegative element has a positive charge.
As an analogy, you can think of it as a game of tug-of-war in which one team is strong enough to pull the rope away from the other team. For example, sodium has an electronegativity of 0. Particular sodium and chloride ions are not "tied" together, but they attract each other very strong because of the opposite charges, and form a strong crystal lattice. When atoms with an electronegativity difference of less than two units are joined together, the bond that is formed is a covalent bond , in which the electrons are shared by both atoms.
In his later years, Pauling became convinced that large doses of vitamin C would prevent disease, including the common cold.
Most clinical research failed to show a connection, but Pauling continued to take large doses daily. He died in , having spent a lifetime establishing a scientific legacy that few will ever equal. The polarity of a covalent bond can be judged by determining the difference in the electronegativities of the two atoms making the bond. The greater the difference in electronegativities, the greater the imbalance of electron sharing in the bond.
Although there are no hard and fast rules, the general rule is if the difference in electronegativities is less than about 0. If the difference in electronegativities is large enough generally greater than about 1. An electronegativity difference of zero, of course, indicates a nonpolar covalent bond. Describe the electronegativity difference between each pair of atoms and the resulting polarity or bond type. Describe the electronegativity EN difference between each pair of atoms and the resulting polarity or bond type.
The EN difference is 1. If the bonding electron pair moves away from the hydrogen nucleus the proton will be more easily transfered to a base it will be more acidic. A comparison of the acidities of methane, water and hydrofluoric acid is instructive.
Methane is essentially non-acidic, since the C—H bond is nearly non-polar. As noted above, the O—H bond of water is polar, and it is at least 25 powers of ten more acidic than methane. H—F is over 12 powers of ten more acidic than water as a consequence of the greater electronegativity difference in its atoms. Electronegativity differences may be transmitted through connecting covalent bonds by an inductive effect.
Replacing one of the hydrogens of water by a more electronegative atom increases the acidity of the remaining O—H bond. Thus hydrogen peroxide, HO—O— H , is ten thousand times more acidic than water, and hypochlorous acid, Cl—O— H is one hundred million times more acidic.
This inductive transfer of polarity tapers off as the number of transmitting bonds increases, and the presence of more than one highly electronegative atom has a cumulative effect.
One way in which the shapes of molecules manifest themselves experimentally is through molecular dipole moments. A molecule which has one or more polar covalent bonds may have a dipole moment as a result of the accumulated bond dipoles. In the case of water, we know that the O-H covalent bond is polar, due to the different electronegativities of hydrogen and oxygen. Since there are two O-H bonds in water, their bond dipoles will interact and may result in a molecular dipole which can be measured.
The following diagram shows four possible orientations of the O-H bonds. The bond dipoles are colored magenta and the resulting molecular dipole is colored blue. In a similar manner the configurations of methane CH 4 and carbon dioxide CO 2 may be deduced from their zero molecular dipole moments. Since the bond dipoles have canceled, the configurations of these molecules must be tetrahedral or square-planar and linear respectively.
The case of methane provides insight to other arguments that have been used to confirm its tetrahedral configuration. Models of these possibilities may be examined by Clicking Here. Substitution of one hydrogen by a chlorine atom gives a CH 3 Cl compound. Since the tetrahedral, square-planar and square-pyramidal configurations have structurally equivalent hydrogen atoms, they would each give a single substitution product.
However, in the trigonal-pyramidal configuration one hydrogen the apex is structurally different from the other three the pyramid base. Substitution in this case should give two different CH 3 Cl compounds if all the hydrogens react. In the case of disubstitution, the tetrahedral configuration of methane would lead to a single CH 2 Cl 2 product, but the other configurations would give two different CH 2 Cl 2 compounds.
These substitution possibilities are shown in the models. However, the structures of some compounds and ions cannot be represented by a single formula. For clarity the two ambiguous bonds to oxygen are given different colors in these formulas. If only one formula for sulfur dioxide was correct and accurate, then the double bond to oxygen would be shorter and stronger than the single bond.
This averaging of electron distribution over two or more hypothetical contributing structures canonical forms to produce a hybrid electronic structure is called resonance. Likewise, the structure of nitric acid is best described as a resonance hybrid of two structures, the double headed arrow being the unique symbol for resonance. The above examples represent one extreme in the application of resonance. Here, two structurally and energetically equivalent electronic structures for a stable compound can be written, but no single structure provides an accurate or even an adequate representation of the true molecule.
In cases such as these, the electron delocalization described by resonance enhances the stability of the molecules, and compounds or ions incorporating such systems often show exceptional stability. The electronic structures of most covalent compounds do not suffer the inadequacy noted above. Nevertheless, the principles of resonance are very useful in rationalizing the chemical behavior of many such compounds. For example, the carbonyl group of formaldehyde the carbon-oxygen double bond reacts readily to give addition products.
0コメント